Fisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada - Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada - Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home What's New DFO National Site Map Media

BACKGROUND
Introduction
Structure
The Process
Documentation
Coordination Committee
 
SCHEDULE
General Information
Meetings 2012
Working Papers 2012
Meetings 2011
Working Papers 2011
Meetings 2010
Working Papers 2010
Meetings 2009
Working Papers 2009
Meetings 2008
Working Papers 2008
Meetings 2007
Working Papers 2007
Meetings 2006
Working Papers 2006
Meetings 2005
Working Papers 2005
Meetings 2004
Working Papers 2004
Meetings 2003
Working Papers 2003
Meetings 2002
Meetings 2001
Meetings 2000
Historical
 
PUBLICATIONS
CSAS research Documents
Stock Status Reports
Fisheries Status Reports
Habitat Status Reports
Proceeding
Miscellaneous
Join Our Mailing List
 
 
The Process

On an annual basis, the calendar of RAP activities is set for the coming year. However, RAP flexible to in-year demands that are not forecast.

The RAP consists of three consecutive phases:


Phase I: Issue Identification

Issues are identified by the RAP Coordinator in consultation with the Coordination Committee, line management, and stakeholders. For each issue, a remit is drafted which provides a clear statement of the points to be addressed and the expected products of the RAP. This should include recommendations made by RAP at its last consideration of the issue. There may be follow-up consultations with stakeholders to ensure that the issues are clearly defined and the products of RAP understood. A chair and meeting date are then defined and the remit used to direct the deliberations of the meeting.

Phase II: Assessment of Issue

Line managers are encouraged to have scientific staff conduct meetings with the industry at an early stage in the scientific review to ensure industry input is an integral part of the scientific review process.

Line management provides the RAP meeting chair with the working papers and draft status reports in advance of the RAP peer review meeting to facilitate prior distribution to participants and reviewers. Line management is strongly encouraged to involve a team of experts in the preparation of these documents. If the documents are not available prior to the meeting, the chair has the prerogative to remove the issue from the meeting agenda.

The chair can involve external experts in the peer review. The RAP Secretariat maintains a small budget to facilitate this participation. The working papers and draft status reports are tabled at a peer review meeting. This review identifies any major problems with the analytical approaches and the basis of the status report. Regarding stock assessments, Stock Status Reports are produced for most stocks every year. However, many assessments will be updates using current fishery and survey information which are not formally reviewed in RAP. The majority of time at the peer review meeting will be devoted to the review of comprehensive assessments of a limited number of stocks and time is to be available at the meeting to review the status reports.

The working papers are not citable but can be upgraded to the CSAS Research Document series. Documents that become Research Documents, must include any additional technical analyses adopted at a meeting and referenced in the status reports.

The status reports are modified to reflect the consensus of the meeting. Proceedings of the meetings provide documentation of the discussions and itemize research recommendations for consideration by the Coordination Committee. The Proceedings also document any minority opinions that meeting participants may have.

Phase III: Communication of Status Reports

Upon completion of the peer review meeting, the chair prepares a briefing note for DFO line management, summarizing the main conclusions of the meeting. This is based on the bullets in the Summary section of the Status Report.

The RAP meeting chair is the final approval authority of status reports. The intent is to finalize the documents at the meeting. However, experience has shown that post-meeting editorials are often required to improve readership and format, without changing the scientific content of the document. The documents are therefore provided by the meeting chair to the RAP Coordinator, who arranges an Editorial Board meeting, with attendance as described earlier. If substantive comments are made at the board meeting, the meeting chair may wish to reconvene the meeting to review the comments. Otherwise, the comments are incorporated into the status report by the author(s). The status report is then returned to the meeting chair, who approves the final product, and sends the document to the RAP Secretariat, which arranges for the translation, transmittal, and distribution of the document.

If it becomes clear during an Editorial Board review that there was no agreement on the status report, the RAP Coordinator is to bring the matter to the attention of the RAP Coordination Committee for resolution.



Return to Top of Page

HOME PAGE




Last Modified : 2007-03-02