Ecosystem Modelling

Biogeochemical Modelling
The biological pump removes
CO2 from the surface ocean
during primary production and exports
organic carbon to the deep sea. This
process effectively lowers atmospheric
CO2 concentration by creating
a vertical gradient in dissolved
inorganic carbon concentration. In most
regions, sinking particulate organic
carbon represents the dominant means of
transport of organic carbon to the deep
ocean. By far the largest pool of organic
carbon in the ocean is dissolved organic
matter ( DOM
). Marine DOM
is released by plankton organisms and
accumulates in the surface ocean, as only
part of it is recycled by bacteria or
photochemical reactions. DOM
is exchanged only very slowly with the
atmosphere, but could have a significant
effect on the global carbon cycle on
longer time scales, owing to the large
size of this carbon pool.
Deep-water formation in the North
Atlantic is thought to be the main
mechanism of transferring this
accumulated DOM
to the deep sea, where it can remain for
several thousand years. The Labrador Sea
as a primary site for North Atlantic Deep
Water formation is a main entry point for
dissolved organic matter to the deep
ocean. DOM
exchange can dominate the total exchange
of organic carbon between surface and
deep water in the Labrador Sea.
The Labrador Sea is characterized by
strong interannual variations in both
physical circulation and plankton
dynamics. Recent advances in ocean
circulation modelling have made it
feasible to model interannual variability
of plankton ecosystem processes and
trophic structure. We use an
optimization-based adaptive approach to
model plankton-DOM
dynamics in 1D in the Labrador Sea forced
by temperature, velocity, and mixing
coefficients obtained from POP model
simulations for this area. We use the
plankton-DOM
model to analyse the response of the
local carbon cycle to climate variations
and its translation into changes in the
mixing and export of DOM
and particulate organic carbon between
the surface and deep ocean in the
Labrador Sea.
Physical-Biological Modelling
The main goal of our physical-biological
modelling work is to assess the behaviour
of in-house planktonic ecosystem models
when subjected to time dependent physical
conditions resulting from climate
variability. This work aims at: i)
reproducing patterns of various ecosystem
variables (e.g. phytoplankton and
zooplankton biomass, nutrients) observed
at different temporal and spatial scales;
ii) providing quantitative
estimates of the processes inherent to
the ecosystem (e.g. primary
production); and iii) providing
tools to assist in ecosystem-based
management and eventual ecological
forecasting.
So far, our physical-biological modelling
work has concentrated on three main
approaches: i) zero-dimensional
(or box) models; ii)
one-dimensional (or water column) models;
and iii) three-dimensional models.
In the zero-dimensional approach, the
ecosystem is essentially contained within
a single box corresponding to the surface
mixed layer at any given time. This
surface box interacts with water
underneath for which the properties are
known (i.e. boundary conditions).
The ecosystem model is physically forced
by the surface mixed layer depth as
diagnosed from temperature and salinity
observations. This modelling approach is
being applied in two main projects:
i) modelling the interdecadal
variability of Nova Scotia's continental
shelf based on historical data archived
at BIO
in the Hydrographic and
BioChem databases;
ii) modelling the interannual
variability of an inshore bay (Lunenburg
Bay, Nova Scotia, Canada) based on high
frequency data collected as part of the
CMEP interdisciplinary initiative.
In the one-dimensional approach, the
ecosystem is represented by multiple
vertical boxes that span the water
column. The boxes interact with each
other and are subject to the physical
conditions generated by a prognostic
ocean model (in our case, GOTM).
The ocean model responds to local
meteorological forcings (e.g. heat
and momentum fluxes) and other physical
forcings (e.g. tidal and vertical
advection currents). This modelling
approach is being applied in two main
projects: i) modelling the
interannual variability at a fixed shelf
station (i.e. Station 2, located
~50 km southeast of Halifax, Nova Scotia,
Canada) based on data collected
ca. biweekly as part of the
AZMP;
ii) modelling the intraseasonal
variability at shelf Station 2 based on
high frequency and low spatial resolution
data collected as part of experimental
deployments of the SeaHorse profiler.
Finally, our three-dimensional modelling
efforts have so far concentrated on the
inline coupling of simple NPZ models
within the ocean circulation model
POP. This
work has been applied in assessing the
behaviour of different ecosystem
parameterizations at the basin scale
level (i.e. North Atlantic).
Moreover, this work forms the basis for
the implementation of biological data
assimilation (i.e. chlorophyll)
capability within physical-biological
models.
Inverse Modelling
Inverse modelling is well established in
the physical sciences and is increasingly
used in aquatic ecology and
biogeochemistry. Inverse modelling can be
viewed as simply the reverse of
simulation or forward modelling. In
simulation modelling, the model is run
forward in time from specified initial
conditions and parameters. Typically, the
simulation is compared to observations to
assess its realism or predictive power.
In inverse modelling, the observations
are used to reconstruct the initial
conditions and the parameters. Inverse
modelling is used because these
simulation parameters are often poorly
known and we want to use the observations
we have to learn as much about them.
The focus of our research is actually on
static models, where there the time
dependence is removed by assuming that
the system is at or near steady state.
Such static models can be used to
reconstruct energy and material flows
between ecological compartments. Because
of the difficulties involved in measuring
all flows in complex ecosystems, inverse
Modelling can be an efficient way to
infer these flows without having to
measure them all. However, inverse
modelling has its own limitations which
we try to address in some of our
research.
Click here for a short tutorial on
inverse modelling of marime ecosystems.
|