|
The endangered status of different, globally distributed, salmon populations
makes it increasingly important to understand the factors that influence
their successful reproduction. Salmon are anadromous species and spend
different parts of their life cycle in both the oceanic and the land [river]
system. So environmental factors affecting their development may range
from genetic to variations in river-runoff and associated acid-rain levels
to ocean currents and climatic changes (e.g. sea temperatures). This pilot
project examines whether there is any detectable transfer of information/climate
signal from land-river systems to air temperatures and hence whether basic
autocorrelation methods could produce climatic indices relevant to anadromous
species?
LAND - CANADA
Many northern river systems have a strong spring runoff potentially associated
with climatic variations. If marine signatures can be detected in the
atmosphere during the autumn seasonal transition, would the spring season
be associated with any feedback [mechanism] between river/land water systems
and the atmosphere? The MONACLE technique was used to generate a regional,
4-month autocorrelation series over the spring months. The resulting indices
exhibited visual comparisons with times series of salmon catch at approx.
95% significance levels but with moderate to low levels of explained variance.
A bootstrap re-sampling analysis indicated these relationships were more
than accidental.
 |
Salmon catch (red) at St. John's
[NB, Canada] and a local spring climate indicator (black).
|
 |
Salmon catch (green) for British
Columbia [Canada] and a local spring climate indicator (black).
|
OCEANS - ALASKA
Other authors have previously described the relationship between Alaska
salmon catch and oceanic processes in the Alaskan gyre region of the N.
Pacific. This known oceanic link may provide an understanding of why the
Alaska salmon catch data [blue] shows a better
comparison with an autumn (marine-related) climate indicator [black] rather
than a possible land/river-related spring indicator. So could obtaining
matches for the environment-to-an-index at different seasons, with MONACLE,
indicate changing land-ocean influences for these species?
 |
Alaska salmon catch (blue) and
an autumn climate indicator (black).
|
Since catch shows a relation to regional climate indicators, an exploration
of basin-scale processes was conducted using the longest historic catch
as a quasi-index.
HISTORIC MAP [1880-1970]
This figure shows locations where long term variations in a spring climate
indicator are correlated to historic Salmon catches in the Saint John
[NB] area. [Red positive match, blue-negative match, grey areas data available
but no match]. The coastal regions with similar [red] or inverse [blue]
trends have, historically, been associated with major salmon fishing efforts.
[Colour scales are set at the 99% sig. level].
 |
Salmon-climate index relationship for 91 years (1880-1970).
|
RECENT YEARS: 1970s on
The last two decades has seen a dramatic decline in salmon stock on both
sides of the North Atlantic. Since several natural populations are no
longer commercially fished any climate relationship has been investigated
using a hypothetical, exponentially declining population from the 1970s
on.
 |
Relationship for Salmon to exponential time trend “index”
for 1970 on.
|
This figure shows regions in southern BC and Scandinavia (red) do have
a positive comparison but there is no evidence of the prior match with
the inland, Great Lakes region. There is an inverse [blue] relationship
around the northern North Atlantic [Labrador, Iceland, and UK]. No causal
relationships are suggested but this pattern could indicate links to recent
North Atlantic climatic processes and have relevance for climate scenario
studies.
SUMMARY
Statistical relationships alone provide minimal insight into environmental
processes. Whether the above spring index approach remains robust is still
to be determined. Both rainfall and ocean temperature data should be incorporated
into this study. The questions of whether spring atmospheric data contains
information/ feedback from the climate system in a similar manner to autumn
data, or whether the role of ocean vs. land influences have changed, continues
to be explored.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Data has been taken from numerous reports and publications plus the databases
of NOAA, FAO, NAFO, NMFS and DFO. Special thanks to Dr. Larry Marshall,
and Peter Amiro with Diadromous Fish Division at BIO for data and numerous
helpful discussions.
|